Skip to main content

THE ECONOMIC FUGITIVE BILL

Given the apparent ease with which economic offenders flee India and cock a snook at the banking and judicial systems, the proposed law to seize their wealth is undoubtedly a welcome measure. In fact, given the public disquiet over the apparent impunity enjoyed by billionaire fraudsters living in the safety of foreign climes, any new law is likely to be viewed in a positive light. However, its success rides on the slim hope that the threat of confiscation of property will act as a serious deterrent to those seeking to flee or as a big incentive for fugitives to return. Legal provisions to confiscate the assets of offenders already exist, but these are regarded as somewhat inadequate. The Fugitive Economic Offenders Bill, which has been cleared by the Cabinet, aims to make up for the shortcomings and provide a fresh legal framework that would enable the confiscation of the property of those evading prosecution by fleeing the country or remaining abroad. From the provision in the Code of Criminal Procedure for attachment of the property of ‘proclaimed offenders’, to sections in Acts targeting smugglers, foreign exchange offenders and traffickers in narcotics, proceedings for forfeiture of property have been marked by shortcomings and procedural delays. But laws deemed draconian, such as the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976, have not exactly been a success. Experience has shown that disposal of confiscated assets is not easy, especially at a price sufficient to recoup losses or pay off all creditors.

Under the Fugitive Economic Offenders Bill, confiscation is not limited to the proceeds of crime, and extends to any asset owned by an offender, including benami property. Such clauses are liable for legal challenge, especially if there are third party interests and doubts about real ownership. Care must be taken to draft a law that is free from legal infirmities from the point of view of fundamental rights and due process. The government has justified not linking the forfeiture clause to criminal conviction by citing the principle enshrined in the UN Convention Against Corruption, which India ratified in 2011. The convention envisages domestic laws for confiscation of property without a criminal conviction in cases in which the offenders cannot be prosecuted for reasons of death, flight or absence. The Bill is reasonable in that a fugitive offender will cease to be one if he or she appears before court. There is a 180-day window during which the property will remain attached, with a provision for appeal against an order of confiscation. While the utility and effectiveness of laws are best assessed in the implementation, it is important to ensure they are fair and reasonable. The shortcomings in previous laws must be avoided, and the new legal regime impartially enforced.

-The article was published in The hindu . Rapidstories.blogspot.com has just edited the heading 

Comments

Post a Comment

POPULAR

Reservation: A Boon or Bane

Reservation is the hot topic of the day. There are endless debates going on at various platforms and levels. Some vehemently oppose it same die hardly support and some stay neutral. Before going on to support or oppose it, first of all we have to detach our emotions from the topic and look at the issue who us tically Background             The issue of reservation cropped up soon after our independence and a committee under Mr. Keleekar was appointed the recommendations of the committee were rejected on the basis of their impracticality.             Again Mandal Commission was constituted which submitted it report in 1980. The report was gathering dust in the office for almost a decade until V.P. Singh govt. decided to implement it in 1992. As per the recommendations, 27% of the seats were to be reserved for OBC’S and 22.5% of seats for SC and ST’s there by maki...
4 comments
Read more

GROWING ADDICTION TO T.V AMONG SCHOOL CHILDREN

With satellite TV channels having invaded in our living rooms in a big way, children of impressionistic age are already addicted to this IDIOT BOX. Their are harmed by the harmful radiations from the picture tube. Not only this, they like to watch TV most of the time and lose out on studies. Some programme have so much violence and vulgarity that they cannot be shown to children. Sustained exposure to television is also associated with behavioral problems, poor social skills and poor sleep. Some people think that it should be totally banned. But, it is not a solution. On the other hand, we should not forget that TV plays a crucial role in dissemination of information. It helps in growth and development of a child. To avoid such addiction of children towards TV, all programme not suitable for children should be blocked. Children should be counselled and should be taught the harmful effects as well as the positive things it do to them at a very small age say from the third cl...
Post a Comment
Read more

CO-EDUCATION A BOON FOR THE UPLIFTMENT OFSOCIETY

What is co-Education? Co-Education means the teaching of both boys and girls in the same school and under the same roof. It also means imparting the same education to both the sexes without any distinction. This system of education aims at bringing boys and girls together. It allows free mixing of sexes without any inhibition The great Greek philosopher, Plato had propagated the system of co-education in the ancient times. He believed that co-education will create a feeling of comradeship between boys and girls. Plato was a great supporter of the education of women. Therefore, he wanted them to be educated with men in the same institutions. He felt that if men and women are taught together, it will develop their personality to the maximum. They will not feel any shyness from each other. He advocated that it was the only method in which both could become useful members of the society. Plato in reality was much influenced by the co-educational system of Sparta, a city of G...
2 comments
Read more

MAHABALI - ONAM AND LIQUOR

Image Onam the most important festival of keralites,this festival is celebrated allover the world where malayalees are present.It is celebrated to welcome Mahabali,the emporar from the dynasty of bhakt prahlad,who was the devotee of Lord vishnu.Prahlad was from asur dynasty(evil).Devtas became jelous of the ruling of maha bali .during those days (mahabali:s rule)all people were considered alike weather they are rich or poor ,asur or sur. Image  Jealousy devtas praise and complained to lord vishnu about mahabali"s empire doing all those enlightenments.They said (the devtas) he could be the next indra ,they didn't want a rakshas even he is from prahlad dynasty . Image  Finally vishnu became a small brahman boy and urged for bhiksha  from mahabali. He knew that the boy was not an ordinary person. Asur guru shukracharya advised him that the boy was vishnu,not to give any commitment. But raja bali refused and told his guru that "I am alwayas doing my duties for the s...
1 comment
Read more

THE DEMONETISATION DILEMMA

It was around 8 at night, people were returning home after office, TV was switched on as usual, PM was speaking at prime time, it was thought to be an usual political speech that our PM tend to give. But, minutes later masses realised that PM was announcing that 85% of cash in our hands will turn just pieces of paper after midnight.  Initially, the general public didn't pay much heed to it, but as the news started pouring in on all channels, the people swung into action and lined outside petrol pumps, grocery shops, medical stores and supermarkets in order to change or use their high denomination notes. The merits and demerits of the demonetisation row are being talked about. Interesting parallels have been drawn to nation love, patriotism and surgical strikes against black money by our clever, diplomatically "correct" ruling coalition. The actual benefit or risk of this drive in the short, medium and long run is difficult to predict, only time has the capacity ...
6 comments
Read more