Skip to main content

THE DEMONETISATION DILEMMA

It was around 8 at night, people were returning home after office, TV was switched on as usual, PM was speaking at prime time, it was thought to be an usual political speech that our PM tend to give. But, minutes later masses realised that PM was announcing that 85% of cash in our hands will turn just pieces of paper after midnight. 

Initially, the general public didn't pay much heed to it, but as the news started pouring in on all channels, the people swung into action and lined outside petrol pumps, grocery shops, medical stores and supermarkets in order to change or use their high denomination notes.



The merits and demerits of the demonetisation row are being talked about. Interesting parallels have been drawn to nation love, patriotism and surgical strikes against black money by our clever, diplomatically "correct" ruling coalition.


The actual benefit or risk of this drive in the short, medium and long run is difficult to predict, only time has the capacity to answer all those. In order to understand DEMONETISATION better, its necessary for us to look back at the history of demonetisation in India. Yes it is not the first time this excercise is taking place. It is the third time to be precise, but nevertheless the largest, voluminous and substantive till date.


In a layman's language demonetisation means restricting out the total number of notes in circulation, rather than exchanging it. Exchanging 100% notes in hand doesn't lead to demonetisation, but it is more of a conversion of currency excercise. Precisely, this is the main reason why earlier demonetisation didn't work in India's favour .



The first demonetisation drive took place pre-independence in January of 1947.  The Govt came out with 2 ordinances on 12 Jan 1946, which was declared a holiday. First ordinance asked banks to furnish information about currency holdings of various denominations (Rs.100, Rs. 500, Rs. 1,000 and Rs.10,000). Second was about telling public that denominations of Rs. 500 and above were demonetised and Rs 100 was spared. People were given 10 days for exchange which meant first helpline ended at 23 Jan. This was later extended to 9 Feb where people had to give explanations on why they could not in first ten days.
The measure did not succeed, as by the end of 1947, out of a total issue of Rs. 143.97crores of the high denomination notes, notes of the value of Rs. 134.9 crores were EXCHANGED. Thus, notes worth only Rs. 9.07 crores were probably ‘demonetised', not having been presented. It was more of “conversion“, at varying rates of profits and losses than “demonetisation". 

The second demonetisation drive took place in January of 1978 under the Janta dal govt of Morarji Desai.
On 16 Jan 1978, the ordinance was announced via All India Radio at 9 AM. Banks and government treasuries were required to submit information (in the form of data ‘return’) to the Reserve Bank of India regarding high denomination notes held with them as at the close of business on 16 January 1978. The notes held would be exchanged for an equivalent value by the Bank. The general public was given three days to surrender high denomination notes for conversion. After 16 January, notes could be exchanged on tender of the high denomination notes in person by the individuals themselves or by a person competent to act on his/her behalf. They had to tender the notes at the Reserve Bank or at notified banks in the prescribed format with full particulars giving, among other things, the source or sources from which the notes came into his/her possession and the reasons for keeping the amount in cash.

This was a totally futile excercise. This time currency actually rose! Leave conversion or demonetisation, this was cumulation. Around 73.1 crore was the demonetised amount (Rs 1000 + 5000 + 10000) in 1977-78.  Compared to this, 1067 crores were added by Rs 100 alone and the rest of the smaller denoms made up another 650 crores.  So, it did not destroy any money stock at all. In 1946, atleast some bit was destroyed. The amount of denoms were also much smaller than seen in 1946.  There were rumours also that demonetisation would take place, hence cash hoarders were well prepared.

Now comes the third demonetisation act, by the Modi government. After 38 years someone was again trying a failed method of driving out black money. The demonetisation this time was a bit different than earlier as, one it was a sudden surprise move by the govt and secondly it had given more time for exchange initially.


The big announcement came and naturally banks were not equipped to handle such a huge rush. Long serpentine lines could be seen and people faced a lot of hardships.Voices started raising against the govt's move and yet again the shrude govt linked demonetisation to nationality and patriotism. When it is a perceived matter of patriotism, none of the Indians have any complaint. They were all happy such a bold step is being taken place. In que it was a common conversation "dikkat to ho rahi hai, par chalo shi hai desh ke hit mai hai"(" we are facing problem, but it is ok, its in the nation's interest"). In the long run, it is in the nations interest or not is debatable, but in the short term it is suicidal to say the least. 


Business has been forced to shut down. Consumption is rock bottom, even the thrirving industries of retail and online commerce are facing the hardship owing to the withdrawal of the popular COD through which 80% sales take place. The daily wage workers of the unorganised are not getting their payment. Sales and purchases by traders are down and dusted. The mandis are having a deserted look. Adding on to the woes, the foreign exchange and value of rupee via-a-vis  dollar is a record low at 68.855. Experts feel this may touch the figure of 70 in a few months owing to the added effect of demonetisation. Hence, in the short term there is no bright spot.


But as the govt and the "patriotic" people, we are highly optimistic of the long term effects of demonetisation. Yes, there are differences from the previous demonetisation and this one. The first is obviously the scale at which it is happening. About 85% value of the total currency is out of circulation. In previous drives it was merely 30-40%. Secondly it is perhaps the first time common Indian as well as rich is being impacted, as earlier transactions with 500, 1000, and 10000 was not so common among average Indians. Thirdly perhaps, it is the first time that actual demonetisation (decreased number of circulating cash) is taking place as there are abundant alternative methods available like net banking, mobile wallet, card payment to name a few. This luxury was not available earlier and only cash could replace cash. In this the govt should also be congratulated for taking certain steps to move towards plastic economy by abolishing various cess and tax on card payments for the time being so that more and more people use it. Fourthly, it is for the first time that RBI is in favour of demonetisation, on the previous two occasions RBI was against it in principle. Moreover, India is a stronger and stable economy than the 70's or 40's and can tolerate such an impact better.    


Having said all this, all the three moves have been primarily aimed at curbing black money and fake currency. But going by the earlier experience it is highly unlikely that black money will be out. According to experts only 10-20% of black money is in form of cash, rest are hoarded as gold, property and in the SWISS bank accounts of high profile people. Recently, news also broke out of fake Rs 2000 notes, so that aspect of the demonetisation is also under threat. 


Nevertheless, it is a good move to begin with. But its futile, if not followed with other measures to weed out black money, fake currency and stop money laundering. The new Benami transaction act is a good followup along with incentivising card payment. Hope the government follows up with stronger and sterner steps and do justice to the sacrifice of the "patriotic Indian". 


HARSHIT HAREENDRA

STUDENT
PIMS JALANDHAR 

    

Comments

  1. Just 6% of the so called black money is in the form of cash and even that has been converted to gold... Or other assets.... It is expected that 40 to 50 thousand crores cash may not be returned to the bank but that cannot be termed black money as most of the poor people without bank account and accessibility to banks might have contributed to that... In India we have 0.01 bank per lakh population so even this rhetoric of cashless economy is just to divert attention to the colossal failure of the government. The expenditure of replacing currency is 1.5 lakh crore and the total approx loss in economy is roughly put at 3.5 lakh crore.... Therefore this demonetisation was a stupid.. Brainless exercise to fool the people of this country!!!

    Nice to read your write up Harshit!!... Keep it up!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thankyou!! Just wrote about what i could gather about the issue !!!

    N ya the govt is hard selling the idea by relating it to patriotism.... N indeed pun was meant wen i said "patriotic indians"

    N thnxx chachu for the fact check n putting light on the real issue :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Awesome work harshit... Evident from the post how much hardwork u have put in.... Mind blowing collection of data..it's really a historical decision taken by PM...dont really knw about the long run consequences but in short tym disastrous results are coming due to poor execution of the action.. Moreover small scale industries nd agriculture sector are badly affected by it.. Hopefully it proves to be a gud decision in long run... .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thankyou Harman!! Different versions of the outcome are coming but one thing is clear all the economist have unanimously said that the new growth rate will be 3-4% lesser than the previous probection. It in itself is an indicator of where things are going.. But lets see what happens when this move is combined with the GST as the govt argues. We as common people cant do much about it apart from expressing our views.

      Delete
  4. When earlier 10,000 rupees note was declared illegal tender,the amount of those demonetised notes were only 0.1% and not 30-40%.Btw well written

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes u r right in 1977-78 0.1% ws 10000,55% 1000 notes n 18% 5000 notes in circulation.

      I arrived at 30-40% as it gives combined figure of the two demonetisation that happened in 46 n 78... Not only of 10000. It included 500 n 1000 as well of both the occasions..
      Lets not get into statistics thing but the principle behind the post that is impacting our lives these days
      N thanks :)

      Delete

Post a Comment

POPULAR

Reservation: A Boon or Bane

Reservation is the hot topic of the day. There are endless debates going on at various platforms and levels. Some vehemently oppose it same die hardly support and some stay neutral. Before going on to support or oppose it, first of all we have to detach our emotions from the topic and look at the issue who us tically Background             The issue of reservation cropped up soon after our independence and a committee under Mr. Keleekar was appointed the recommendations of the committee were rejected on the basis of their impracticality.             Again Mandal Commission was constituted which submitted it report in 1980. The report was gathering dust in the office for almost a decade until V.P. Singh govt. decided to implement it in 1992. As per the recommendations, 27% of the seats were to be reserved for OBC’S and 22.5% of seats for SC and ST’s there by maki...

GROWING ADDICTION TO T.V AMONG SCHOOL CHILDREN

With satellite TV channels having invaded in our living rooms in a big way, children of impressionistic age are already addicted to this IDIOT BOX. Their are harmed by the harmful radiations from the picture tube. Not only this, they like to watch TV most of the time and lose out on studies. Some programme have so much violence and vulgarity that they cannot be shown to children. Sustained exposure to television is also associated with behavioral problems, poor social skills and poor sleep. Some people think that it should be totally banned. But, it is not a solution. On the other hand, we should not forget that TV plays a crucial role in dissemination of information. It helps in growth and development of a child. To avoid such addiction of children towards TV, all programme not suitable for children should be blocked. Children should be counselled and should be taught the harmful effects as well as the positive things it do to them at a very small age say from the third cl...

CO-EDUCATION A BOON FOR THE UPLIFTMENT OFSOCIETY

What is co-Education? Co-Education means the teaching of both boys and girls in the same school and under the same roof. It also means imparting the same education to both the sexes without any distinction. This system of education aims at bringing boys and girls together. It allows free mixing of sexes without any inhibition The great Greek philosopher, Plato had propagated the system of co-education in the ancient times. He believed that co-education will create a feeling of comradeship between boys and girls. Plato was a great supporter of the education of women. Therefore, he wanted them to be educated with men in the same institutions. He felt that if men and women are taught together, it will develop their personality to the maximum. They will not feel any shyness from each other. He advocated that it was the only method in which both could become useful members of the society. Plato in reality was much influenced by the co-educational system of Sparta, a city of G...

MAHABALI - ONAM AND LIQUOR

Image Onam the most important festival of keralites,this festival is celebrated allover the world where malayalees are present.It is celebrated to welcome Mahabali,the emporar from the dynasty of bhakt prahlad,who was the devotee of Lord vishnu.Prahlad was from asur dynasty(evil).Devtas became jelous of the ruling of maha bali .during those days (mahabali:s rule)all people were considered alike weather they are rich or poor ,asur or sur. Image  Jealousy devtas praise and complained to lord vishnu about mahabali"s empire doing all those enlightenments.They said (the devtas) he could be the next indra ,they didn't want a rakshas even he is from prahlad dynasty . Image  Finally vishnu became a small brahman boy and urged for bhiksha  from mahabali. He knew that the boy was not an ordinary person. Asur guru shukracharya advised him that the boy was vishnu,not to give any commitment. But raja bali refused and told his guru that "I am alwayas doing my duties for the s...