Skip to main content

LITTLE LEFT FOR THE LEFT

From the start, it was apparent that Tripura was an important battle for the Bharatiya Janata Party to win. Its campaign started early, with large rallies being held in the state as far back as March 2017. National leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi and party president Amit Shah, were parachuted down several times into the tiny state.
With Assam, Manipur and Arunachal Pradesh turning saffron, Tripura became another crucial stop for the BJP as it spread across the North East. But the intensity of the campaign suggests something more than mere numbers was at stake. The BJP saw this as a significant ideological win, a rightwing party triumphing over a long-running communist government with a popular chief minister.
The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh’s mobilisations were visible on the ground, paving the way for the BJP. But on the eve of the elections, saffron politics was not the burden of the BJP’s campaign. While it exploited old social fissures between Tripura’s tribal and non-tribal populations, the BJP pitched itself as the party of development, holding the keys to the Central coffers in Delhi. It also took aim, quite deftly, at the Left’s weaknesses.
So after 25 years of Left rule, Tripura has swung decidedly Right. The BJP looks set to form government in the state along with its ally, the Indigenous People’s Front of Tripura. It is a change reminiscent of the Trinamul Congress’s sweep of West Bengal in the 2011 assembly elections, which ended 34 years of the Left Front.

A map of discontent

The initial stages of counting in Tripura indicate that the saffron party has stormed the red bastion. From no seats in the 2013 assembly elections, it won a majority this time. From a vote share of 1.54% in 2013, it has surged to 42.9%, according to the Election Commission figures on Saturday evening. The Congress, which emerged as the main opposition in Tripura after assembly elections of 2013, has virtually disappeared. So has the Trinamul Congress, which once had ambitions of spreading beyond Bengal into Tripura.
A look at the electoral map suggests the alliance led by the BJP has spread itself across the state, making gains in various constituencies and vote bases. For instance, it has made headway in the state capital of Agartala and surrounding areas, once the stronghold of the Congress. These are largely urban constituencies where Bengalis form the majority. But its ally, the Indigenous Peoples’ Front of Tripura, also shows a surge in tribal areas which fall under the Tripura Autonomous District Council Area. The tribal party, which won no seats and just 0.46% of the vote share in 2013, looked set to win eight seats out of the nine it contested, as of Saturday evening, cornering at least 7.6% of the votes cast.
It is a map that reflects the many discontents of Tripura. This election is a vote against the Left as much as it is a vote for the BJP.

End of Sarkar raj

Chief Minister Manik Sarkar’s 20-year tenure has now ended. India’s “poorest” chief minister, who is known for his personal austerity, leaves behind a mixed legacy.
Many in the older generation credit him with pulling the state out of the conflict which roiled Tripura in the 1980s and 1990s. In 2015, Sarkar managed to get the Armed Forces Special Powers Act, a Central law which gives the army powers to open fire and to search and arrest with little judicial accountability, withdrawn from the state. It was counted as one of the major successes of his government.
But the Communist Party of India (Marxist), comfortably ensconced in Tripura for over two decades, must be held guilty of not paying heed to the growing roster of grievances against it. In a state with some of the highest unemployment figures in the country, it did not address the growing restiveness of a new generation with few jobs and opportunities. The Left’s old rhetoric of being a pro-poor party did not find resonance with this pool of young voters while the BJP’s promise of development and social mobility, of jobs and growth appealed to it.
In its last years, Sarkar’s government was swamped by allegations of corruption, which became the launchpad for the BJP’s attack. It wooedthousands of teachers done out of government jobs after the Supreme Court declared that appointments made by the Left were invalid. It also raised the issue of the Rose Valley chit fund scam, which spread to Tripura from Bengal and left thousands of investors in the lurch.

The tribal vote

In the autonomous district council areas, Sarkar ignored the warning signsof tribal discontent. The Left had enjoyed substantial support here, but the last few years saw a steady erosion in this vote base. Sarkar’s carefully crafted narrative of social cohesion seems to have come undone in the past few years. In the state’s tribal belt, the old faultlines between the so-called indigenous population and Bengali-speaking residents, often branded as illegal Bangladeshi immigrants, have grown pronounced once again.
It explains why the Indigenous Tribal Peoples’ Front, once a non-entity, is set to win eight out of the nine seats it contested. The party is believed to have links to separatist militant groups, which demanded a tribal state of Twipra carved out of Tripura.
As it tied up with the tribal party, the BJP struck a careful balance, showing sympathy for tribal demands but playing them down when it campaigned in constituencies dominated by Bengalis. It also managed to project the Left as a party which stood for Bengali interests. During the election campaign, Himanta Biswa Sarma, the BJP’s election strategist in the North East, suggested that Sarkar head to one of three destination: Kerala, the only other state in which the Left remains relevant, Bengal or Bangladesh.
Sarkar may blame the BJP for sharpening local insecurities and separatist demands but his government fell short in vital ways. First, it was unable to dispel tribal anxieties about being “swamped” by outsiders, especially Bengali settlers, and driven out of their ancestral lands. Second, it did not pay heed to a growing sense of neglect in these areas. Tribal voters are bitter about the obvious disparities with non-tribal areas, which, they claim, have cornered any development that may have taken place during the Left’s tenure.
These were failures that proved to be fatal for the Left in Tripura.

-The article was published in scroll.in . Rapidstories.blogspot.com has just edited the heading


Comments

Post a Comment

POPULAR

Reservation: A Boon or Bane

Reservation is the hot topic of the day. There are endless debates going on at various platforms and levels. Some vehemently oppose it same die hardly support and some stay neutral. Before going on to support or oppose it, first of all we have to detach our emotions from the topic and look at the issue who us tically Background             The issue of reservation cropped up soon after our independence and a committee under Mr. Keleekar was appointed the recommendations of the committee were rejected on the basis of their impracticality.             Again Mandal Commission was constituted which submitted it report in 1980. The report was gathering dust in the office for almost a decade until V.P. Singh govt. decided to implement it in 1992. As per the recommendations, 27% of the seats were to be reserved for OBC’S and 22.5% of seats for SC and ST’s there by maki...
4 comments
Read more

GROWING ADDICTION TO T.V AMONG SCHOOL CHILDREN

With satellite TV channels having invaded in our living rooms in a big way, children of impressionistic age are already addicted to this IDIOT BOX. Their are harmed by the harmful radiations from the picture tube. Not only this, they like to watch TV most of the time and lose out on studies. Some programme have so much violence and vulgarity that they cannot be shown to children. Sustained exposure to television is also associated with behavioral problems, poor social skills and poor sleep. Some people think that it should be totally banned. But, it is not a solution. On the other hand, we should not forget that TV plays a crucial role in dissemination of information. It helps in growth and development of a child. To avoid such addiction of children towards TV, all programme not suitable for children should be blocked. Children should be counselled and should be taught the harmful effects as well as the positive things it do to them at a very small age say from the third cl...
Post a Comment
Read more

CO-EDUCATION A BOON FOR THE UPLIFTMENT OFSOCIETY

What is co-Education? Co-Education means the teaching of both boys and girls in the same school and under the same roof. It also means imparting the same education to both the sexes without any distinction. This system of education aims at bringing boys and girls together. It allows free mixing of sexes without any inhibition The great Greek philosopher, Plato had propagated the system of co-education in the ancient times. He believed that co-education will create a feeling of comradeship between boys and girls. Plato was a great supporter of the education of women. Therefore, he wanted them to be educated with men in the same institutions. He felt that if men and women are taught together, it will develop their personality to the maximum. They will not feel any shyness from each other. He advocated that it was the only method in which both could become useful members of the society. Plato in reality was much influenced by the co-educational system of Sparta, a city of G...
2 comments
Read more

MAHABALI - ONAM AND LIQUOR

Image Onam the most important festival of keralites,this festival is celebrated allover the world where malayalees are present.It is celebrated to welcome Mahabali,the emporar from the dynasty of bhakt prahlad,who was the devotee of Lord vishnu.Prahlad was from asur dynasty(evil).Devtas became jelous of the ruling of maha bali .during those days (mahabali:s rule)all people were considered alike weather they are rich or poor ,asur or sur. Image  Jealousy devtas praise and complained to lord vishnu about mahabali"s empire doing all those enlightenments.They said (the devtas) he could be the next indra ,they didn't want a rakshas even he is from prahlad dynasty . Image  Finally vishnu became a small brahman boy and urged for bhiksha  from mahabali. He knew that the boy was not an ordinary person. Asur guru shukracharya advised him that the boy was vishnu,not to give any commitment. But raja bali refused and told his guru that "I am alwayas doing my duties for the s...
1 comment
Read more

THE DEMONETISATION DILEMMA

It was around 8 at night, people were returning home after office, TV was switched on as usual, PM was speaking at prime time, it was thought to be an usual political speech that our PM tend to give. But, minutes later masses realised that PM was announcing that 85% of cash in our hands will turn just pieces of paper after midnight.  Initially, the general public didn't pay much heed to it, but as the news started pouring in on all channels, the people swung into action and lined outside petrol pumps, grocery shops, medical stores and supermarkets in order to change or use their high denomination notes. The merits and demerits of the demonetisation row are being talked about. Interesting parallels have been drawn to nation love, patriotism and surgical strikes against black money by our clever, diplomatically "correct" ruling coalition. The actual benefit or risk of this drive in the short, medium and long run is difficult to predict, only time has the capacity ...
6 comments
Read more