Skip to main content

Our Fate In The Hands Of Reservations?

If gandhi was alive today...)

For those of you who don’t know, the Mandal commission was established in 1979 by the central government to identify the socially or educationally backward in India and suggest measures for their upliftment. Today, after more than 30 years of the Mandal commission and 60 years of republic India; 49.5% of the seats in premier institutions are reserved for backward categories. This is more than 60 % in some states like Tamil Nadu. According to the preamble of the Indian constitution, India is a sovereign, socialist, secular and democratic country. It’s indeed unfortunate that the government itself identifies and certifies people based on their caste. Well, they don’t stop at certifying, these so called lower castes are then given exclusive privileges in various sectors. The reason for this, as quoted in the first paragraph is that people born in backward classes don’t have the same privileges offered to their forward class counterparts. I beg to differ, that’s not the complete scenario now. The Mandal commission hypothesis may have been valid in that era (the 70s). I was not there then and therefore it would not be fair if I commented on it. But the current scenario is quite different. Reservations may be needed in a vastly diverse country like ours, but is it necessary to have it all based on ones caste or in some cases, religion

It would be ideal if this reservation was based on the economic status of the individual. The central government tried to do that sometime earlier with the new ‘creamy layer’ policy, but was met with much flak from other quarters, especially the state governments. The creamy layer policy, even though inadequate was appropriate at the least. This policy excluded the creamy layer (people with income above a certain range) only among the OBCs, not among the SCs and STs. This creamy layer policy has only been implemented in some states.

Consider this scenario. There was a guy who, in the 80s got into a premier institution like an IIT and then even made it to an IIM, thanks to the fact that he belonged to a Scheduled Caste (plus, he might have worked hard-that’s immaterial). Ok, he was poor and all and the reservation policy was a boon for him to compete, lets say; with his rich forward caste neighbour’s son (who had the same amount of ‘merit’ as this poor backward caste guy). This rich neighbour’s son also made it to an IIT and then an IIM (without any reservation, mind you.) Now, in 2010, both are working in some MNCs and are quite well off. Each of them have a kid (both quite average in ‘merit’) and they both appeared for IIT-JEE 2009 and the results came out. Now, only the SC kid has made it through (thanks to reservation) and the forward caste kid doesn’t get a rank and makes it to a lesser known private college. Both performed equally (good or bad).

Now, it’s up to you to evaluate the fairness of the situation. Both these kids are rich, have attended top schools and were brought up in the same environment. So, why is the discrimination there? Isn’t this detrimental to the quality of any premier institution?

Now, rewind. Assume that the Mandal commission had recommended reservation based on the financial status of the individual. Think about the whole scenario again, and the possible outcome would have been infinitely better. Most of the story would be same. Both their sons would have a fair playing ground and the forward caste guy might have made it (thanks to all seats being open and fair). But the present scenario is, unfortunately, much different. Even though the SC kid was brought up with premier education (assumed), he still can enjoy reservation when it comes to higher education. This scenario must have convinced you that caste based reservation is nothing but a big farce, played by the politicians who happily indulge in ugly vote bank politics.

Anything, which is by virtue of birth, must not be given any weightage. The time has come to change for the better and make everything fair and just.

TAKE YOUR STAND .

BY HARSHIT H 


Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

Post a Comment

POPULAR

Reservation: A Boon or Bane

Reservation is the hot topic of the day. There are endless debates going on at various platforms and levels. Some vehemently oppose it same die hardly support and some stay neutral. Before going on to support or oppose it, first of all we have to detach our emotions from the topic and look at the issue who us tically Background             The issue of reservation cropped up soon after our independence and a committee under Mr. Keleekar was appointed the recommendations of the committee were rejected on the basis of their impracticality.             Again Mandal Commission was constituted which submitted it report in 1980. The report was gathering dust in the office for almost a decade until V.P. Singh govt. decided to implement it in 1992. As per the recommendations, 27% of the seats were to be reserved for OBC’S and 22.5% of seats for SC and ST’s there by maki...

GROWING ADDICTION TO T.V AMONG SCHOOL CHILDREN

With satellite TV channels having invaded in our living rooms in a big way, children of impressionistic age are already addicted to this IDIOT BOX. Their are harmed by the harmful radiations from the picture tube. Not only this, they like to watch TV most of the time and lose out on studies. Some programme have so much violence and vulgarity that they cannot be shown to children. Sustained exposure to television is also associated with behavioral problems, poor social skills and poor sleep. Some people think that it should be totally banned. But, it is not a solution. On the other hand, we should not forget that TV plays a crucial role in dissemination of information. It helps in growth and development of a child. To avoid such addiction of children towards TV, all programme not suitable for children should be blocked. Children should be counselled and should be taught the harmful effects as well as the positive things it do to them at a very small age say from the third cl...

CO-EDUCATION A BOON FOR THE UPLIFTMENT OFSOCIETY

What is co-Education? Co-Education means the teaching of both boys and girls in the same school and under the same roof. It also means imparting the same education to both the sexes without any distinction. This system of education aims at bringing boys and girls together. It allows free mixing of sexes without any inhibition The great Greek philosopher, Plato had propagated the system of co-education in the ancient times. He believed that co-education will create a feeling of comradeship between boys and girls. Plato was a great supporter of the education of women. Therefore, he wanted them to be educated with men in the same institutions. He felt that if men and women are taught together, it will develop their personality to the maximum. They will not feel any shyness from each other. He advocated that it was the only method in which both could become useful members of the society. Plato in reality was much influenced by the co-educational system of Sparta, a city of G...

MAHABALI - ONAM AND LIQUOR

Image Onam the most important festival of keralites,this festival is celebrated allover the world where malayalees are present.It is celebrated to welcome Mahabali,the emporar from the dynasty of bhakt prahlad,who was the devotee of Lord vishnu.Prahlad was from asur dynasty(evil).Devtas became jelous of the ruling of maha bali .during those days (mahabali:s rule)all people were considered alike weather they are rich or poor ,asur or sur. Image  Jealousy devtas praise and complained to lord vishnu about mahabali"s empire doing all those enlightenments.They said (the devtas) he could be the next indra ,they didn't want a rakshas even he is from prahlad dynasty . Image  Finally vishnu became a small brahman boy and urged for bhiksha  from mahabali. He knew that the boy was not an ordinary person. Asur guru shukracharya advised him that the boy was vishnu,not to give any commitment. But raja bali refused and told his guru that "I am alwayas doing my duties for the s...

THE DEMONETISATION DILEMMA

It was around 8 at night, people were returning home after office, TV was switched on as usual, PM was speaking at prime time, it was thought to be an usual political speech that our PM tend to give. But, minutes later masses realised that PM was announcing that 85% of cash in our hands will turn just pieces of paper after midnight.  Initially, the general public didn't pay much heed to it, but as the news started pouring in on all channels, the people swung into action and lined outside petrol pumps, grocery shops, medical stores and supermarkets in order to change or use their high denomination notes. The merits and demerits of the demonetisation row are being talked about. Interesting parallels have been drawn to nation love, patriotism and surgical strikes against black money by our clever, diplomatically "correct" ruling coalition. The actual benefit or risk of this drive in the short, medium and long run is difficult to predict, only time has the capacity ...